The challenges of coccidiosis in poultry

Poultry coccidiosis is a constant and costly threat that:

Cocci hex 1

> Different parasite species = peaks at different bird ages

> Late outbreaks can occur due to poor immunity

Cocci hex 2

> A ubiquitous parasite

> Can survive in the environment for long periods2

coccidiosis negatively impacts key performance indicators

> Broiler feed conversion rate (FCR): up to 10%3

> Weight gain: up to 7%3

> Intestinal Integrity (I2) scores4

> Mortality5

> Disease rates6-9

Don’t let poultry coccidiosis fly under the radar


Monitoring Intestinal Integrity scores via HTSi makes sure that poultry coccidiosis
is not quietly impacting the productivity of a flock over time.

Consistent and effective management of coccidiosis in poultry has big benefits, it can:

Benefits of controlling coccidiosis in poultry

Using Maxiban™ in combination with Monteban™ provides:

Reduced complexities
Reduced complexities

Lower labour requirements

Stable coccidial population control

Performance improvements
Consistent performance improvements that last

- FCR improvements of 5.4616

- Stable intestinal integrity (I2) scores17

- Over 20 years of successful coccidiosis control for
poultry producers worldwide 

Maxiban and Monteban contribute to the development of acquired immunity
The development of acquired immunity

Adding another layer of protection

HTSi coccidiosis poster
Maxiban logo

combines the ionophore, narasin, with the coccidiostat, nicarbazin.

These two active ingredients work synergistically to effectively control coccidiosis.

Monteban product logo

contains the ionophore, narasin, for reliable, effective control of coccidiosis in poultry


Learn how the active ingredients in Maxiban and Monteban effectively control coccidiosis

Narasin:
the ionophore of choice

Narasin is significantly more effective at reducing intestinal lesions than monensin, when administered at the same dose rate8

Achieve continuous and stable coccidiosis control
by using Maxiban and Monteban continuously

Chicken on one leg

No anorexic effect,
bird maintain feeds
intake18

Allows bird immunity to
develop, while still effectively
controlling disease

Maxiban and Monteban have been helping poultry producers
achieve effective coccidiosis control for over 20 years.


But what about other coccidiosis solutions?

  1. McDougald, L. 2003. “Parasitic Diseases: Coccidiosis.” Diseases of Poultry. 11th ed.:974-985
  2. López-Osorio S, et al. (2020) Overview of Poultry Eimeria Life Cycle and Host-Parasite Interactions. Front. Vet. Sci., 03 July. Sec. Veterinary Infectious Diseases
  3. Marusich, W. et al. (1972). “Effect of coccidiosis on pigmentation in broilers.” Br. Poultry. Sci. 13:577-585
  4. Elanco HTSi data
  5. Watkins KL, et al. (2017). Observational analysis of broiler production and health data collected during the transition to a raised without antibiotic program. Poult. Sci. 96 (Suppl. 1)
  6. Lanckriet A, et al. (2010). The effect of commonly used anticoccidials and antibiotics in a subclinical necrotic enteritis model. Avian Pathol. Feb;39(1):63-8
  7. Clave H et al Sci Tech Avicoles 2004
  8. Ruff, MD, et al. (1980) Anticoccidial activity of Narasin in broiler chickens reared in floor pens. Poultry Sci; 59:2008-2013
  9. HTSi Data EMEA region 2010-2016
  10. Blake DP et al. (2020). Re-calculating the cost of coccidiosis in chickens
  11. Kadykalo, S. “The value of anticoccidials for sustainable global poultry production.” 2017. International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents. 1-7
  12. Williams, R. 1999. “A compartmentalized model for the estimation of the cost of coccidiosis to the World’s chicken production industry”. Int Journ.for Parasitoloty. 29(8):1209-1229
  13. Saggiorato et al., - Can we predict early performance of a broiler flock? Experience from Clostridium Firstest – XIIIth European Poultry Conference – Tours, 2010
  14. Salois M, Heskett E. (2017). Raised without antibiotics can lead to more use of medically important antibiotics, unpublished.
  15. Lanckriet A, Timbermont L, De Gussem M, Marien M, Vancraeynest D, Haesebrouck F, Ducatelle R, Van Immerseel F. The effect of commonly used anticoccidials and antibiotics in a subclinical necrotic enteritis model. Avian Pathol. 2010 Feb;39(1):63-8
  16. For a company producing 100 million birds per year on a full Maxiban™ and Monteban™ programme compared to a Monensin/Nicarbazin and Salinomycin programme for 3 crops of the year. Elanco data on file REF-22071
  17. Elanco, 2018: HTSi UK Data 2015-2018 / Performance data 2014-2018 – Tom Hepburn – EKS Specialist
  18. Weppelman, R. et al. Comparison of Anticoccidial Ecacy, Resistance and Tolerance of Narasin, Monensin and Lasalocid in Chicken Battery Trials. 1977. Poultry Sci; 56.5:1550-59 5.
  19. Metzler,M. et al. “Eects of Monensin Feeding and Withdrawal Time on Growth and Carcass Composition in Broiler Chickens.” 1987. Poultry Sci; 66.9:1451-58 6.
  20. Harms, R. and Buresh R. “Influence of Salinomycin on the Performance of Broiler Chicks.”1987. Poultry Sci; 66: 51
  21. Elanco Animal Health Study ELA1900304 2019. Data on file
  22. FVEx data on file – 2011-2019
  23. Elanco data on file
  24. Kaldhusdal, M. et al 2012 “Non-soluble fibres and narasin reduce spontaneous gizzard erosion and ulceration in broiler chickens” Avian Pathology 41(2), 227-234